« IELTS Reading: short answers | Main | IELTS Writing Task 2: in theory... in reality »

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

hi simon,

After months of preparation, today I appeared in the IELTS speaking.

I am following your blog since January, andanmany followed many of your lessons.

I am anxious, what band I will achieve.

Anyone tell me whats the diffent between are you or do you. In other word are you solve this question or do you solve this qurstion i dont know exactly whats matter between them.
Simon sir its humble request clear my this doubt

These rules tell US ( not tell use) that ..

What you mean ? Kami

Thanks Kami. Well spotted!

I'm afraid,i don't understand what kami wanna explain.could you explain an innovative way?

Thank you so much! It's really helpful to me.

Also, I'm studying more phrases such as life-saving drugs, red-colored parts, the most-asked question, carbon-rich soil,.. I find these have rules too but I'm not sure about the rules I concluded.
Does anyone have ideas for that?
Simon, could you please tell us a little bit about rules for these phrases?

Thank you.

Could you explain these words:
fire-fighter
mother-in-law
I’ve found them on Cambrige dictonary. Thank you

Hi, Simon,


I recently attended an online course held by a current IELTS examiner in China who i believe to be a true examiner. One problem he pointed out in most students’ writing is TR mistake.

Let me just make an example.

1. Some people think that social networking site has a negative impact on individual and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
So if i respond the question in the first paragraph like this :while I admit social networking site has a negative impact on individual and society, I believe that it also has positive effects on individual and society.
Second paragraph: negative impact
Third paragrah: positive impact

2. According to that examiner, positive impact is irrelevant to the argument of the essay, so i am likely to get a low mark like 5 or 5.5 in TR for this essay. (he also mentioned that if students get marks in TR below 6, even they got 6 in other bands, the overall band for writing will be below 6, so TR is the key part for overall band)


3. This has remind me of one of your model essays,
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs(for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhoods or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Introduction

It is sometimes argued that high school students should be made to do some work in their local communities. While I disagree with the idea of making such programmes compulsory, I do believe that voluntary community service could benefit young people.


4. If the that examiner is right, the same logic should be applied to your model essay. It seems that the benefits of community service is not relevant to the argument, because it can not prove that it should be or should not be a compulsory course.(i understand that the way you write in this structure is easy for students to imitate, i just wonder if it is still the write way to continue this way.)


I would appreciate if you could help me to answer this question.

Thank you so much.

Jeff

Luu,

Those are all adjectives, not nouns. The research that was described in Monday's reading lesson said:

Rule 1: If the compound word is a verb (like to blow-dry), or an adjective (like world-famous), it probably needs a hyphen.

...

Lily,

As far as I can see, "firefighter" is most commonly written as one word. Try googling it to see examples.

"Mother-in-law" is a three word compound, but I suppose it sort of follows the first rule in the lesson above, in the sense that "in" has only two letters.

Please note: These 'rules' are the result of very recent analysis of the English language. The researcher (see Monday's lesson) does also say that there are exceptions. The rules work 75% of the time.

Strictly speaking there are no "rules" for punctuation: it is a matter of convention. Punctuation is primarily there to assist the reader toward the correct meaning, intonation, and phraseology.

As the graph below shows, it is possible to spell some words with or without the hyphen without either being "wrong". Sometimes a new word is hyphenated but over time loses the hyphen: over time "e-mail" will probably become "email", for example.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=e-mail%2Cemail%2Cfire-fighter%2Cfirefighter%2Cmother-in-law%2Cmother+in+law%2Cbathing+suit%2Cbathing-suit%2Cwashing-machine%2Cwashing+machine&year_start=1980&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Ce%20-%20mail%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cemail%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cfire%20-%20fighter%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cfirefighter%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cmother%20-%20in%20-%20law%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cmother%20in%20law%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cbathing%20suit%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cbathing%20-%20suit%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cwashing%20-%20machine%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cwashing%20machine%3B%2Cc0

Here are some other useful links:

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/punctuation/hyphen

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/hyphen/

Oleg,

Absolutely right. Traditional language teaching acted as if the 'grammar rules' came first and the language came second.

These days we can use online search tools and huge corpora of 'real' language instead of grammar books. Let's say that 'patterns' is a better word than 'rules'.

@ jeff

It seems to me that there are two possible readings of "has a negative impact":

a) = has a (net) negative impact (overall); that is, on balance the negatives outweigh the positives.

b) = has a negative impact (and any positives do not matter)

To me, (a) would seem more natural, legitimate; and (b) excessively picky. In some Cambridge exams, such as FCE, CAE, CPE, specific guidelines are issued every time for examiners in relation to each essay question , but this is not the case for IELTS, so we are reliant on the moderation process, where some marking of each examiner is checked by a principal examiner to see if all are being marked in the same way.

so why we write "full_time" and "part_time"?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)