« IELTS Listening: 'obesity' topic | Main | IELTS Writing Task 1: describing steps »

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Hi,simon
I sit the IELTS exam last Saturday.
In the writing task, the task required us to discuss the both sides of the role of education in people's health.I only discuss one side of that. Do you think it is a very serious mistake? I worry about that a lot!

Hi Simon,

if the task requires IELTS candidate to discuss the both sides. That is it.
Can he say his opinion ? in the introduction or at the conclusion
Will he get penalty ?

Many thanks

I stated the opinions on both side and concluded my position in the last paragraph on my latest IELTS exam. In the end, I got band 7 on writing. In terms of my experience, I think it's fine to have an argument whether the test ask you contend or not.

But I'm not so sure about that experience was based on either good luck or principles from the examiner?

Hi Sunny,

Unfortunately, you do need to discuss both sides if the question asks you to, so you will lose some points for "task response".

Always try to answer ALL parts of the question fully.

...

Hore Boy,

The question will make it clear:

If it says "discuss both views", don't include your opinion.

However, questions often say "discuss both views and give your opinion". In this case, it's clear that you should include your opinion.

...

Agnes,

Yes, adding an opinion in your conclusion (even when the question doesn't ask for it) will not lower your score. However, it will not raise the score either. I think you got a 7 because you used good language and organised your ideas well.

Hope this helps

Simon

hi simon,
i have given ielts three times and I need 7 each in academic module but at all three times i missed by 0.5 in writing please help me,
harry

Hi Simon,
1.I noticed that you mentioned at the very first which view you support. And you talk about both sides in the following passages. Is that a module to answer this type of question "Discuss both these views and give your own opinion"
2.for questions like "to what extend do you think the advantage outweigh the disadvantage" or "do you agree or disagree" what kind of module should I use?
Many many thanks!!!!

Hi Hardikkumar,

It's difficult for me to give any specific advice because I haven't met you or seen your work. The only thing I can advise is that you keep going - keep working hard and practising. Many students have been in the same situation, and it's just persistence that gets you through in the end. Maybe you could also find a teacher who can check your work and give specific advice.

...

Hi Maria,

Yes, this is my model for "Discuss both views and give your own opinion" questions. I would do the same thing for "do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages" questions.

"Do you agree or disagree" questions are different. For these questions, you don't need to give both sides of the argument because they ask for YOUR opinion. Give your opinion in the introduction, then support it in the rest of the essay.

Hope this helps

Simon

Thanks a lot for your reply. But I am a little confused about your "Give your own opinion in the introdection" as well as the" give your own opinion" in the discuss- both-views-question. Does my view has to be one of the views shown in the question or another view I conjure up. I noticed you prefer one of the views as your response. Does this represent your "opinion"?

1.Another question. I noticed you gave full weighting on both sides. Should I do the same in the question of "Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage". Could you give more explanation of "(to what extent)Do you agree or disagree" type of question?
2.I aim for a minimum of 7 in writing. Do you think phrases like "In this essay, I will present both sides and also my own view on this subject. / Before airing my opinion, I will elaborate this controversial issue from diverse perspectives." as the end of the first paragragh are good enough for a 7 band?

Hi simon,

Is that compulsory to write 5 paragraphs for task 2 essay?

eva

Hi Maria,

1. Yes, I take one of the views from the question as my opinion. Look at the link below to see a full essay written in this way:

http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2010/03/ielts-writing-task-2-sample-essay-higher-education.html

2. I'd do the same thing for "Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages". For "agree/disagree" questions, you can write whatever you want because the question asks for YOUR view (not necessarily both sides).

3. Both of your phrases are very nice, but the examiner will know that you have memorised them for any topic. What REALLY gets you a high score is vocabulary (words and phrases) that are related to the particular topic of the question.

Hope this helps

...

Hi Eva,

There is no rule about how many paragraphs you should write. I usually write 4.

Simon

Hi,Simon.
Which of the following sentence is correct?
1.There are several benefits to students doing what their teachers let them do.
2. There are several benefits for students to do what their teachers let them do.

Thank you...

Hi Adverb,

Both seem a little strange. Maybe I'd write something like:

"There are several benefits for students WHO do..."

Hi Simon.

I have some questions to ask you.
In task 2 essay, if the question is about "Do you agree or disagree..." If i agree to that statement, so in my 1st para i will write what is my opinion, and then can i write the reason why i agree with that in 2nd para, 3rd para i write about the opposite sides, and d last para i mention again my view. will this confuse the examiner? or is that better to write the reason why i agree to that in both 2nd and 3rd para??

2. i am confused with visitor 'centre' and 'center', 'catalog' and 'catalogue'. Which one should i use in IELTS exam?

Thanks you.

Hi Eva,

I wrote a lesson about your first question:

http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2010/06/ielts-writing-task-2-opinion-essays.html

2. You can use both spellings - British or American spellings are accepted.

Hope this helps

I don't quite understand one idea: "fixed punishments could deter criminals". How it can deter criminals?

Hi Thanh,

If criminals know exactly what the punishment for any crime will be, that might deter them. (Remember, this is only an idea/opinion - it's not a fact)

Hi, I'd like to share what I did with this task. I'll be taking my exam next week.


It is argued that sentences for criminal acts should be equal regardless of the severity of the crime. In my opinion, punishments should depend upon factors involved in an individual crime and the motives behind the act.

On one hand, fixed sentences regard all crimes equal and punishments are the same, for instance, life imprisonment. I think this kind of treatment for criminals is unfair because crimes differ in various ways. Theft for example is a lesser crime and I think it doesn't equate with the severity of the crime committed by murderers. However, fixed punishments have an advantage. People will be scared committing lesser crimes because of the implications that even though it is less grave, they could still serve the life sentence.

On the other hand, sentences should depend on the severity and motive of an individual. There are crimes that are less grave than killing a person. I think this is a fair delivery of sentences and criminals have the chance of correcting their acts by not serving too long in prison. Some crimes are just committed because of poverty and family reasons. For example a snatcher stole money because that person wanted to buy medicines or food to his or her family.

In conclusion, fixed punishments serves well to scare people and would-be criminals to commit any crimes, however a fair sentence and an unbiased judgment should prevail taking into consideration the motive and circumstances surrounding the crime.

Thanks for sharing bleakwind. You seem to have the right idea.

Good luck next week!

Thanks Simon, I hope I could get a passing score. I'm focusing more on writing and speaking because I find them hard. I love your site by the way, helped me a lot! Cheers!

No problem!

hi simon
can i write intoduction as following:
there are two schools of thoughts regarding types of punishment that should be given to the criminals.Some people say that there should be fixed punishments,whereas others believe that different factors contributing towards crime should be considered.I agree with te later opinion.

That's fine Sohaib.

hi simon ...it is really helpful for me ....thank!:)I'm a student from myanmar

No problem Ye Wai.

Hi Simon I 've to give my Ielts exam next week and I need ur help in writing .is it necessary to add idioms and sayings in task2 to get 7 tell me

Hi Ritu,

No, don't use idioms and sayings. Have a look through my lessons to see the kind of language I use.

Hi Simon pl justify my answer with appropriate bands. The question is more and more people work today in the large cities which problem can it cause ? How should the govt encourage people to stay in small regional towns There is no denying the fact that employment opportunities are at grand scale in urban areas .In search of good jobs the people of small villages and towns are forced to move in big cities ,reluctantly. Consequently ,the inhabitants of cities face enormous problems .let us throw light on these occurring problems and the solutions,too. Indeed ,overpopulation in big cities is the major effect of this transference of people from small towns to big cities .Eventually ,it causes a high consumption of water ,electricity,and place for accommodation which is inevitable in big cities of world like London and Tokyo etc.Substantially ,more people means more vehicles on roads which tend to congestion and pollution like air pollution and noise pollution etc.Hence,many diseases occur as asthma and skin allergies. However,to reduce this trend government should make logical perspective and perception like promotion of small scale industries in suburbs or by countryside areas.Another factor is to establish factories and limited companies in villages to enhance employment .Financial support of government will work as icing on cake here for example loans at low interest. Hammering the final nail it can be concluded that by applying optimal and fruitful approaches of employment in small villages and regional towns government can iradicate this problem easily.So that urban and rural socities can achieve hight of excellence.

Hi Simon u didn't checked my answer

Hi Ritu,

I'm afraid I don't offer essay correction or scoring. If I did this, everyone would send me their essays.

Dear Simon,

How about I start with this introductory sentence with your own introduction....

Crime and punishment statutes are invariably a matter of controversy.

Then rest of your introduction... Sorry if this kind of my attempt is wrong.

Does the above sentence look awkward..?

Thanks

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment